Scoop: Democrats eye forced vote to censure GOP Rep. Randy Fine over anti-Muslim post
By Andrew Solender
Transparency Analysis
Primary Narrative
House Democrats are discussing forcing a censure vote against Republican Rep. Randy Fine over anti-Muslim social media posts, with some Democratic leaders supporting action while others worry it plays into Fine's desire for attention.
⚠ Conflicts of Interest
Democratic leadership faces internal conflict: supporting censure energizes progressive base but may amplify Fine's platform and distract from other legislative priorities
Evidence: Rep. Landsman's quote that censure 'is what he wants' and concern about attention-seeking; contrast with Jeffries' strong condemnation
Who Benefits?
Congressional Progressive Caucus
Positioning as defenders of Muslim Americans and civil rights, strengthening progressive base support
Rep. Randy Fine
Increased media attention and platform amplification through censure debate, potentially energizing his base
Framing Analysis
Perspective
Democratic perspective and progressive outrage; article centers Democratic calls for accountability and frames Fine's statements as clearly offensive
Tone
Language Choices
- 'disgrace' (Jeffries' characterization, presented as fact in headline framing)
- 'intense backlash' (loaded descriptor)
- 'increasingly irreverent and partisan use of censure' (frames censure as politically motivated tool)
- 'sick extremists' (Jeffries quote, strong language)
Omitted Perspectives
- Republican leadership perspective beyond 'no comment' (Johnson's office did not respond)
- Fine's full contextual explanation (article includes his reference to pro-Palestinian activist post, but frames it as 'doubling down')
Entity Relationships
Khanna is identified as a senior CPC member discussing censure within the group | Evidence: 'Another senior CPC member, speaking on the condition of anonymity' and Khanna identified as CPC member raising issue with leadership
Pocan is a House Democrat commenting on censure, implied to be part of progressive coalition | Evidence: Pocan quoted as progressive voice supporting censure
Jeffries is House Minority Leader, leadership position within Democratic caucus | Evidence: 'House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) forcefully condemned Fine'
Factual Core
Rep. Randy Fine posted a statement comparing Muslims unfavorably to dogs on social media, citing a pro-Palestinian activist's post. House Democrats are discussing forcing a censure vote if Speaker Johnson doesn't act, though internal disagreement exists on strategy.
Full Article
House Democrats are discussing a forced vote to censure Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.) if Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) doesn't take action, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Fine's recent comments on social media saying "the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one" have drawn intense backlash from colleagues, including one fellow House Republican. While the increasingly irreverent and partisan use of censure in recent years has frustrated lawmakers, some progressives say this is a rare case where use of the tool is genuinely warranted. "I usually hate censure resolutions against members, but I've never seen someone deserve one more," Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) said of Fine in a post on X. The earliest a censure vote could happen is when the House returns from its recess next week. What we're hearing: Two Congressional Progressive Caucus members told Axios that the group is privately discussing the idea of forcing a censure vote. "I have raised with CPC leadership that Fine must be censured," Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) told Axios in a text message Tuesday. Khanna added: "We cannot stand idly by as Muslim Americans are described as less than dogs by a sitting member. Many of my colleagues feel similarly." Another senior CPC member, speaking on the condition of anonymity to share details of private conversations, confirmed to Axios it has "popped up" multiple times in the group's texts this week and "could likely happen." Driving the news: Fine, who has positioned himself as one of Congress' most vocally anti-Muslim members, said Sunday in a post on X, "If they force us to choose, the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one." Fine said he was referencing a post from a pro-Palestinian activist saying, "Finally, NYC is coming to Islam. Dogs definitely have a place in society, just not as indoor pets. Like we've said all along, they are unclean." He has since doubled down on his post, saying in one interview: "Not only are we supposed to let all these people in, we're supposed to smile and submit while they redefine what it means to be in America." Several Democrats publicly called for Fine to be censured in posts on social media, though none specifically said they plan to introduce a resolution or force a vote. Others said the onus falls on Johnson, urging the speaker to rebuke Fine and remove him from his committees. Spokespeople for Fine and Johnson did not respond to requests for comment on this story. Yes, but: Not every Democrat is on board with a forced censure vote. Some argue it would simply play into Fine's hands. Rep. Greg Landsman (D-Ohio), a swing-district moderate, told Axios a censure vote is "what he wants." "Ricky, or whatever his name is, just wants the attention. He says obscene, hateful things for attention," Landsman said, adding that "unfortunately, Congress has a few attention-seekers." Between the lines: It is not clear whether Democratic leadership would support the effort, though House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) forcefully condemned Fine as a "disgrace" in a statement on Tuesday. "Republican leaders must hold this so-called Member of Congress accountable," Jeffries said. "House Democrats will not let the racist and bigoted behavior of Randy Fine go unchecked." He added: "Accountability is coming to all of these sick extremists when the gavels change hands in November, if not sooner." Axios' Kate Santaliz contributed reporting
