Kennedy says FDA "will act on" ultra-processed foods petition, but indicates no new rules
By Rebecca Falconer
Transparency Analysis
Primary Narrative
Kennedy announces the Trump administration will respond to a petition to regulate ultra-processed foods, but signals the response may focus on transparency rather than new regulations.
⚠ Conflicts of Interest
Kennedy's 'Make America Healthy Again' agenda creates political incentive to appear responsive to ultra-processed food concerns while his actual policy direction (transparency vs. regulation) aligns with industry preferences
Evidence: Article notes 'critics have said he's mostly achieved pledges from companies to swap out single ingredients, which wouldn't have much of an impact on health' and Kennedy explicitly states 'I'm not saying that we're going to regulate ultra-processed food'
Kennedy's well-documented vaccine skepticism creates potential credibility issues that could undermine his health authority, which he attempts to address by drawing parallels to choice/science framing
Evidence: Whitaker directly asks if Kennedy's vaccine stance 'might make people reluctant to support' him on ultra-processed foods; Kennedy responds with vaccine-choice framing
Who Benefits?
Food industry/Consumer Brands Association
Kennedy's statement that he is 'not saying that we're going to regulate ultra-processed food' provides reassurance against stricter regulations while appearing responsive to health concerns
Trump administration
Framing as responsive to health concerns while avoiding costly regulatory burdens on major industry donors and employers
Framing Analysis
Perspective
Centered on Kennedy's position and intentions; secondary focus on industry reassurance and Kessler's qualified support
Tone
Language Choices
- 'The intrigue' framing suggests mystery/drama rather than policy substance
- 'Between the lines' signals Kennedy's actual position differs from stated position, creating skepticism
- Industry statement uses 'rigorous evidence-based safety standards' without qualification, presented as fact
- 'Make America Healthy Again' branded language presented without critical context
Omitted Perspectives
- Public health advocates who support stronger regulation (beyond Kessler's qualified endorsement)
- Detailed scientific evidence on health impacts of ultra-processed foods beyond CDC data reference
- Perspectives from affected communities (low-income consumers who rely on affordable ultra-processed foods)
- Labor/worker perspectives in food manufacturing
Entity Relationships
Kennedy serves as HHS Secretary | Evidence: Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told CBS
Kennedy, as HHS Secretary, directs FDA policy; he directed FDA to review all GRAS affirmations in October | Evidence: Kennedy 'directed the FDA to review all affirmations of GRAS'
Kessler, former FDA chief, is spearheading a citizen petition to the FDA calling for regulatory changes | Evidence: 'the petition that the former FDA chief is spearheading, which calls on the agency to no longer classify sweeteners'
Factual Core
Kennedy announced the Trump administration will respond to a petition requesting FDA regulatory changes on ultra-processed foods and GRAS sweeteners, but indicated the response may focus on transparency and informed choice rather than new regulations. Kessler's petition calls for removing sweeteners from GRAS classification.
Full Article
The Trump administration will respond to a citizen petition calling for a regulatory overhaul of ultra-processed foods, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told CBS' "60 Minutes" in an interview broadcast Sunday evening. The big picture: "We will act on David Kessler's petition," Kennedy told CBS' Bill Whitaker of the petition that the former FDA chief is spearheading, which calls on the agency to no longer classify sweeteners including corn syrup as "Generally Recognized as Safe" (GRAS). "The questions that he's asking are questions that FDA should've been asking a long, long time ago," he added. "There is no way for any American to know if a product is safe if it is ultra-processed." Kennedy in October directed the FDA to review all affirmations of GRAS, a process that Axios' Ashley May notes companies use to show a substance is safe to eat without needing full agency approval. The intrigue: Kennedy didn't detail in the CBS interview what action he would take in response to the petition, but indicated it may not result in regulations the petition calls for. "I'm not saying that we're going to regulate ultra-processed food," said Kennedy, who last month issued new government guidelines that for the first time in the U.S. formally recommended cutting down on ultra-processed foods. "Our job is to make sure that everybody understands what they're getting, to have an informed public." Zoom out: CDC data out last year showed adults and kids over age 1 got over half of their daily calories from ultra-processed foods like hamburgers, pizza and sweetened drinks in the U.S. from 2021 to 2023. Between the lines: Kennedy has made cleaning up the U.S. diet a priority, with his "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) agenda. However, critics have said he's mostly achieved pledges from companies to swap out single ingredients, which wouldn't have much of an impact on health. Of note: Whitaker asked Kennedy if his skeptical stance on vaccines "might make people reluctant to support" him on ultra-processed foods. "My stance on vaccines is the same," Kennedy said. "People should have good science and they should have choice," he added. "People who want to get vaccines can get them and they can get them fully insured." Kessler noted on the show that he and Kennedy disagreed on several issues. "In the strongest possible terms, when it comes to vaccines, I disagree. But if he's willing to take action on these ultra-processed foods, I will be the first to applaud that," said Kessler, who led health campaigns against Big Tobacco in the 1990s. "We changed how this country views tobacco. We need to change how this country views these ultra-processed foods." The other side: Consumer Brands Association, a major trade group representing the food industry, told CBS in a statement, "Companies adhere to the rigorous evidence-based safety standards and nutrition policy established by the FDA to deliver safe, affordable and convenient products that consumers depend on every day." Go deeper: Food firms sued for allegedly marketing "addictive" products to kids Editor's note: This article has been updated with additional details throughout.